Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act

MDLEA

Menu
  • MDLEA
    • § 70501 – Findings and Declarations
    • § 70502 – Definitions
    • § 70503 – Prohibited acts
    • § 70504 – Jurisdiction and Venue
    • § 70505 – Failure to comply with international law as a defense
    • § 70506 – Penalties
    • § 70507 – Forfeitures
    • § 70508 – Operation of submersible vessel or semi-submersible vessel without nationality
  • Related Laws
    • 14 U.S.C. § 522 – Law Enforcement
    • 21 U.S.C. § 952 – Importation of controlled substances
    • 21 U.S.C. § 955 – Possession on board vessel
    • 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) – Safety Valve Provision
  • International Law
    • UNCLOS
      • Preamble
      • Part I – Intro
      • Part II – TS and CZ
      • Part III – Int’l Straits
      • Part IV – Archipelagic
      • Part V – EEZ
      • Part VI – CS
      • Part VII – High Seas
      • Part VIII – Islands
      • Part IX – Enclosed Seas
      • Part X – Land-locked
      • Part XVI – General
      • Signatories
    • 1988 Convention
    • Other Maritime Treaties & Agreements
  • Blog Posts
  • Full Decisions
  • Other
    • Advertise
    • Donate
    • Contact
Menu

UNCLOS – Preamble

The States Parties to this Convention,

Prompted by the desire to settle, in a spirit of mutual understanding and cooperation, all issues relating to the law of the sea and aware of the historic significance of this Convention as an important contribution to the maintenance of peace, justice and progress for all peoples of the world,

Noting that developments since the United Nations Conferences on the Law of the Sea held at Geneva in 1958 and 1960 have accentuated the need for a new and generally acceptable Convention on the law of the sea,

Conscious that the problems of ocean space are closely interrelated and need to be considered as a whole,

Recognizing the desirability of establishing through this Convention, with due regard for the sovereignty of all States, a legal order for the seas and oceans which will facilitate international communication, and will promote the peaceful uses of the seas and oceans, the equitable and efficient utilization of their resources, the conservation of their living resources, and the study, protection and preservation of the marine environment,

Bearing in mind that the achievement of these goals will contribute to the realization of a just and equitable international economic order which takes into account the interests and needs of mankind as a whole and, in particular, the special interests and needs of developing countries, whether coastal or land-locked,

Desiring by this Convention to develop the principles embodied in resolution 2749 (XXV) of 17 December 1970 in which the General Assembly of the United Nations solemnly declared inter alia that the area of the seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, as well as its resources, are the common heritage of mankind, the exploration and exploitation of which shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole, irrespective of the geographical location of States,

Believing that the codification and progressive development of the law of the sea achieved in this Convention will contribute to the strengthening of peace, security, cooperation and friendly relations among all nations in conformity with the principles of justice and equal rights and will promote the economic and social advancement of all peoples of the world, in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations as set forth in the Charter,

Affirming that matters not regulated by this Convention continue to be governed by the rules and principles of general international law,

Have agreed as follows:

Recent Blog Posts

  • The 5th Circuit Weighs in on Determining Jurisdiction Before Change of Plea
  • Florida Court Rules that MDLEA Can Snare Drug Traffickers Who Never Set Sail
  • Supreme Court Denies Davila-Reyes Defendants’ Petition
  • District of Puerto Rico Addresses Jurisdiction for a Third Time in U.S. v. Thomas Chalwell
  • Happy Fourth of July!

Latest Decisions

  • United States v. Velez-Acosta, No. 22-13528, 2024 WL 806537 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2024)
  • U.S. v. Osvaldo Gonzalez, No. 22-cr-20350-ALTMAN, 2023 WL 4580901 (S.D.Fla. July 18, 2023)
  • U.S. v. Barbosa-Rodriguez, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4230143 (D.P.R. June 28, 2023)
  • U.S. v. Mariani-Romero, et al., No. 22-313 (FAB), 2022 WL 20184569 (D.P.R. June 22, 2023)
  • U.S. v. Iona-Dejesus, No. 22-20473-CR, 2023 WL 3980082 (S.D. Fla. May 4, 2023)

Disclaimer

This blog is written by an attorney employed by the U.S. Government. However, all views expressed on this website are mine and should not be construed as the views of the U.S. Government, including the U.S. Coast Guard.

©2025 Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act