If you’re a self-proclaimed MDLEA enthusiast—and I’m assuming you are, given your interest in this blog—then you’ll appreciate Judge Besosa’s recent decision in U.S. v. Barbosa-Rodriguez, — F.Supp.3d —-, 2023 WL 4230143 (D.P.R. June 28, 2023) where he concludes that Congress did not exceed its authority in enacting the MDLEA and denies defendants’ motion to…
Category: Jurisdiction
U.S. v. Mariani-Romero, et al., No. 22-313 (FAB), 2022 WL 20184569 (D.P.R. June 22, 2023)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAINANT JOSUÉ MARIANI-ROMERO, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 22-313 (FAB) June 22, 2023 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1 Before the Court is defendant Jainant Josué Mariani-Romero (“Mariani”)’s motion to dismiss. The motion was joined by defendants José Alejandro Martínez-Peralta (Martínez) and Ariel…
Puerto Rico District Court Rules the Term “High Seas” Includes the EEZ of the Dominican Republic
Lately, there has been a recurring argument presented by defendants involved in MDLEA prosecutions. In short, the argument asserts that foreign states have exclusive jurisdiction over criminal activity in their exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and thus, U.S. courts lack jurisdiction to hear cases where the criminal conduct—i.e. the MDLEA violation—occurred in that foreign state’s EEZ….
U.S. v. Menas Asprilla, et al., No. 22-20013-CR, 2023 WL 3496459 (S.D. Fla. May 17, 2023)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ELIEZER MENAS ASPRILLA, Register No. 02671-506, JULIO CESAR RAMIREZ MOTA, Register No. 02665-506, HENNY MANUEL CASTRO RAMIREZ, Register No. 02669-506, and DANNY ALEXANDER CARRERA-BERNABE, Register No. 02661-506, Defendants. CASE NO: 22-20013-CR-ALTMAN 05/17/2023 ROY K. ALTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER *1 After an hours-long evidentiary hearing—the first of two—we dismissed…
Southern District of Florida rules government failed to establish subject-matter jurisdiction by not asking the right questions during interdiction
Here is a holding you don’t see every day. In a rare and lengthy (20+ pages) ruling, U.S. v. Menas Asprilla, et al., No. 22-20013-CR, 2023 WL 3496459 (S.D. Fla. May 17, 2023), a district court in the Southern District of Florida dismissed an indictment due to the Government’s failure to establish subject-matter jurisdiction. The…
The “High Seas” Includes Another Nation’s Exclusive Economic Zone
A Southern District of Florida (“SDFL”) court recently considered several commonly raised arguments by defendants charged under the MDLEA. These arguments seek to dismiss indictments on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction, alleging that the U.S. Coast Guard did not ask the appropriate questions during the initial boarding process and that the MDLEA does not…
Eleventh Circuit Affirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Despite Discrepancy Between Two Coast Guard Reports Concerning a Vessel’s Nationality
If you’ve ever litigated an MDLEA case, you’ve likely seen the various reports (or case package) that the Coast Guard completes during the boarding. Well, sometimes there are discrepancies in those reports requiring factual findings by a court concerning the credibility of the boarding officer (“BO”). That’s exactly what happened in U.S. v. Liver Gruezo,…
What does it mean to “fly” your nation’s flag pursuant to the MDLEA?
When arguing (or teaching) issues of the MDLEA, we tend to over-think much of the statute’s language, largely due to the seemingly expansive breadth and extraterritorial application of it. However, the question of whether a vessel is “flying” a flag in accordance with the MDLEA (and international law) is an easy one to answer. Luckily,…
Defendants Can’t Challenge Non-Jurisdictional Defects After Pleading Guilty in the Middle District of Florida
A trail court in the Middle District of Florida confirms that defendants can’t challenge non-jurisdictional defects after they have plead guilty. The facts here are nothing knew to readers of the MDLEA blog: “While on routine patrol, the CGC Hamilton detected two [go-fast vessels (GFVs)] with bales of suspected contraband on deck approximately 500 yards…
Eleventh Circuit Finds U.S. Agreements with Foreign States Sufficient to Confer Jurisdiction
In a short decision, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that agreements (often called “Bilateral Agreements) between the United States and foreign states/nations are sufficient to establish how a foreign nation can consent and waive objections to jurisdiction under the MDLEA. In United States v. Zapata, the USCG interdicted a sailing vessel…