When arguing (or teaching) issues of the MDLEA, we tend to over-think much of the statute’s language, largely due to the seemingly expansive breadth and extraterritorial application of it. However, the question of whether a vessel is “flying” a flag in accordance with the MDLEA (and international law) is an easy one to answer. Luckily,…
Category: MDLEA
Section 70504(b) permits prosecution for violations of the MDLEA “in any district” for vessels interdicted on the high seas
At times it is hard to understand why a defendant who is caught violating the MDLEA in the Pacific Ocean (i.e. near Columbia) is brought over 2000 miles to the east coast of the United States (i.e. Florida or Puerto Rico) for prosecution. The justification? As explained in a recent decision by a District Court…
Defendants Can’t Challenge Non-Jurisdictional Defects After Pleading Guilty in the Middle District of Florida
A trail court in the Middle District of Florida confirms that defendants can’t challenge non-jurisdictional defects after they have plead guilty. The facts here are nothing knew to readers of the MDLEA blog: “While on routine patrol, the CGC Hamilton detected two [go-fast vessels (GFVs)] with bales of suspected contraband on deck approximately 500 yards…
District of Puerto Rico Court Holds § 70502(d)(1)(C) Complies with International Law
In her recent decision on a motion to dismiss, Hon. Silvia Carreño-Coll did not agree with defendants’ argument that the government lacked jurisdiction under § 70502(d)(1)(C) of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) despite the decision in U.S. v. Dávila-Reyes, 23 F.4th 153 (1st Cir. 2022) still pending with the First Circuit. The facts…
Eleventh Circuit Finds U.S. Agreements with Foreign States Sufficient to Confer Jurisdiction
In a short decision, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that agreements (often called “Bilateral Agreements) between the United States and foreign states/nations are sufficient to establish how a foreign nation can consent and waive objections to jurisdiction under the MDLEA. In United States v. Zapata, the USCG interdicted a sailing vessel…
Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Court’s Denial of Minor Role Reduction
Takeaway: Crewmembers on a small go-fast vessel caught smuggling narcotics in international waters are not simply couriers; thus, they are not entitled to a minimal- or minor-role reduction pursuant to USSG § 3B1.2. In a case with familiar facts to most MDLEA attorneys, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the lower court’s denial of a minor reduction…
Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Court’s Drug Weight Calculation for Jettisoned Contraband
Takeaway: (1) IONSCAN technology is sufficiently reliable for admission at trial in MDLEA cases, and (2) based the evidence available (i.e. testimony of the size and number of packages jettisoned), a court can reasonably calculate the quantity of narcotics trafficked even if they are jettisoned and unable to be recovered. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in…
First Circuit Rules Safety-Valve Provision Did Not Apply to MDLEA
Take-away: At time of defendant’s sentencing in June 2018, the statutory safety-valve provision, which allowed relief from statutory mandatory minimum sentences, did not apply to offenses under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA). This case stems a December 11, 2017 interdiction by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG). The USCG intercepted a go-fast vessel in the…